Modern racists use religious attack to smear blacks
“I haven't voted in over twenty years,” an acquaintance recently confided. “But I went and registered to vote in this election, just so I can vote against Obama.”
“Why is that?” I inquired.
“Because he's a Muslim!”
I was silent for a moment, and then I pointed out the obvious. Everyone knows that Obama belongs to the Church of Christ. If he were a Muslim, the conservative attempt to smear him with the unpatriotic words of Rev. Jeremiah Wright would have fallen flat. In fact the presidential candidate recently renounced his association with Wright's church because of some extremist views and language – extremist Christian views, mind you.
I explained the facts patiently the first time my associate brought up the Muslim argument, but this individual was not swayed by facts. Finally I asked, “When you say 'Muslim,' does that mean black?”
The answer was affirmative. Since that conversation, I've received numerous emails (some spam and some, unfortunately, forwarded from well-meaning friends) claiming that Obama must be defeated because we do not want a Muslim in the White House.
Apparently the n-word, which is too vulgar to voice in polite company, has been replaced with the M-word: Muslim. As a white Christian, I can only imagine how this accusation sounds in the ears of black Christians.
Frankly, the M-word attack on Obama implies that black Christians cannot really be trusted. Since black Muslims do exist, any professing Christian with dark skin might be a secret Muslim! Yet the very idea of a “secret Muslim” is an oxymoron. A person cannot be a secret Muslim anymore than he can be a secret Christian. Both religions require adherents to practice faith openly, not “hide it under a bushel.”
If any of my dear readers find themselves swayed by “Obama is a Muslim” arguments, I invite you to investigate the claims using that quintessential urban legend spotlight, http://www.snopes.com/.
In case you're wondering, Obama was sworn in on the Bible, not the Quran. He attends church, not Mosque. He never attended a Madrassa or Wahabi school in Jakarta, as some news sources even claimed. Investigative reporting by CNN revealed that Obama's early education consisted of public schooling, plus two years of Catholic school.
Obama is no Muslim, closet or otherwise. In fact, he is more open than most politicians about his faith, speaking often of a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. He walked the aisle at Trinity United Church of Christ sixteen years ago. He knelt at the altar on a Sunday morning. He stood and professed Jesus Christ as his lord and savior.
But the M-word need not be accurate to deal its blow. In fact, it can be used as a sort of code word, the speaker and the hearer sharing a secret camaraderie. After all, not everyone is crass enough to don a t-shirt that says “Obama is my slave” or depicts him as Curious George. Likewise, the n-word is now considered too offensive for all but the most hateful bigots. Substituting the M-word for the n-word allows those racists who consider themselves civilized to engage in a bit of thinly disguised black-bashing while feigning innocence.
The tactic is not new. Racial prejudice has often been disguised as religious objection. Throughout history the targets of racism and genocide have been many – indigenous peoples, Jews, gypsies, etc. In nearly every case, racism is overlaid with religious complaint. Persecution is excused by the claim that the persecuted are heathens, pagans, savages, or cannibals.
Whether the Spanish wanted Mayan treasure or the USA wanted to own and occupy Hawai'i, the tactics were the same – they labeled the people heathens and suddenly it was acceptable to rape, pillage, steal and exterminate.
Hopefully Obama is in no danger of extermination, but the M-word could very well cost him the presidency. That will not hurt him too much. After all, he'll still be a senator, a wealthy author, and the first black American to secure a major party nomination. He has enough money, fame and connections to last a lifetime.
But what about the rest of us? Can we survive four more years of Bushism?
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

9 comments:
Thanks for this post. You have brought me from darkness to light. Now I know why so many, normally intelligent, people are saying what your friend said. I had not considered this explanation at all.
I hadn't thought about the anti-Muslim fear-mongering in that way, either. I'm not sure that's the only thing behind anti-Muslim rhetoric, but I think you're correct about it being a significant factor.
I continue to be highly disappointed in Christian friends who blithely send around and post the "Obama is a Muslim" lies. The ones who disappoint me the most, however, are those who try to justify it by "where there's smoke, there must be fire" arguments. And besides, he's "pro-abortion," so any smears against him are justified.
Apparently dealing with his Senate voting record and other public records of his positions and statements just isn't convincing enough. But it's "anti-American" to smear the current President or Obama's presumptive opponent.
Oh, and the stupidest thing I've ever read was about how Obama not wearing a flag lapel pin proves his lack of allegiance to this country, as does his standing at attention rather than putting his hand over his heart during the singing of the National Anthem. HUH?????
I'm thinking about doing a blog post about flag/National Anthem/Pledge of Allegiance/lapel pin etiquette. We've been so thoroughly Bush-whacked that we think anyone who doesn't do as the President does, is anti-American! Right on down to mispronouncing "nuclear." (The number of educated Republicans who I've heard say "NU-CUE-LAR" is ridiculous!) I think about how the formal Spanish lisp came about, centuries ago, and I realize I should not be surprised at people fawning over and emulating those in power.
What Psalmist said. Sigh.
I've read this article, and I am amazed. It's truly embarrassing that someone would write this and believe even half of what they're saying, and I sincerely hope your readers are intelligent enough to look at this and label it what it really is: an illogical, completely unfounded argument that should be dismissed immediately. Just because one person makes a statement, it cannot be attributed to every other person on the earth. If someone believes Obama is a Muslim, it has nothing to do with race. Absolutely nothing. His name is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. That's why people believe he is a Muslim. Add to that the fact that his father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Christian to Islam convert, and you'll find there are many, many legitimate sources for the "racist" claim that Barack Obama is a Muslim. Do your homework, write intelligent articles, and leave race out of this election. The reason why people will be voting for McCain this year is because Obama is an estreme leftist, egocentric, socialist with an agenda that will further divide and destroy the country. Not because he is black.
Hey, Doc, I have a trivia question for you. What was the name of the Hebrew general who worked side by side with the Prophetess Deborah to bring victory to the Jews? (This is in Judges, in the Old Testament of the Bible.)
J.
Hertzberg has great piece In the New Yorker about Jerome Corsi title attack dogs, for any of you who want to take a look; easily googled up.
And if Ga Mtn Man is browsing I have a good link for yall at my blog about a January Charlie Rose show on the politics of Race and gender focussing on the SC Primary
foxofbama.blogspot.com
Interesting post. I'd like to hear your view on the people who are voting for both candidates (including Obama,) BECAUSE of their race. I can not tell you how many people I talk to who say they are voting for Obama because he is black-in order to make a statement. I believe one person said, "How cool would it be to have a BLACK president. We'd be making history." I scoff at this. And I agree with Doc... leave race out of this. It comes from both sides unfortunately.
Hi, Brittney. I do think there's a difference in voting for, rather than against, Obama on the basis of race. One who votes against him b/c he is black is expressing hate. One who votes for him b/c he is black is trying to move our country toward greater diversity in leadership. If the voter is non-white, s/he may also be going for a thing called "representation."
Personally, I would not vote for a person just because of their race, gender, etc. But it could certainly be a factor. I'm sure the same is true for others. There was a black Republican candidate, and he dropped out early for lack of support.
If people just want a black president, why didn't they rally around Alan Keyes? I see two main reasons: (1.) They didn't like his policies; people DO consider far more than race. (2.) Repubs are more bigoted than Dems, thus their candidates are always white males.
well said Jeannie,
it is one of the most sickening things I am witnessing in your U.S. elections - the constant attacks on this good man and his family...in very very evil ways...
and this from professing Christians...
who need to self-examine a lot more to see their subconscious racism.
The kindest thing I can say is, that I know this is from fear...
but we do have a Saviour...
Post a Comment