The blessings and curses of cohabitation
As a teenager, I found my first real job at Martin-Boyd Christian Home, a Church of Christ retirement community in Chattanooga. The patience, compassion, and work ethic I learned there have had a lasting impact on my life. Imagine my excitement when my own daughter, a 2009 high school graduate, asked me to drive her to Martin-Boyd for a summer job interview.
I was excited to see the changes made over the years. Martin-Boyd has always been an establishment that honors its elderly residents, but now the architecture was updated with beautiful crown molding and individual door frames that give residents a greater sense of dignity and autonomy.
In the center of the elegant sitting room, lively birds flitted about a large glass enclosure, lending their bright colors to the atmosphere. The fattest cat I have ever seen perched on a richly upholstered chair. A sleek tabby weaved his way across the room, turning to rub against the leg of someone’s walker and then pausing for a head scratch.
The familiarity and obvious pleasure the residents feel toward these animals supports what elder care professionals have known for some time: Pets are therapeutic. In fact, when an aging person can no longer live at home, one of the greatest losses may be the loss of their animals. Petting a cat or dog has been shown to lower blood pressure, ease depression, and put a smile on one’s face.
Keeping pets should be source of enjoyment, enhancing the life of both the humans and the animals involved. In our society, we see many examples of harm caused by greed, arrogance, and even mental illness.
From time to time, the news carries a story of a house overrun by pets. Typically we hear about an older woman housing hundreds of cats in a home filled with feces and even a few rotting corpses. Authorities swoop down on the unfortunate woman, charging her with animal cruelty and removing the numerous animals to treat them as victims. But who is really the victim here? Seems to me the cats are in charge, treating their poor “owner” as a slave while they procreate madly. As the old joke goes, dogs have owners but cats have staff.
Then there are the pit bull owners, who may be crazier than the cat ladies. Every time a child is mauled by a savage dog, pit bull apologists rush in to blame the child. Last Friday an eight-year-old Lookout Mountain girl was rushed to the hospital with life-threatening injuries after a pit bull attack. The apologists noted that the attack happened in the pit bull’s own yard while he was “defending his territory” from the girl’s small terrier. Although the dog owner had no proof of rabies inoculation, the apologists began their mantra of “Where were this girl’s parents?”
Eight-year-old children are often allowed to walk down the streets of their own neighborhood – particularly when a pet is missing. Chaining a pit bull in the yard is an unsafe practice, just as it would be unsafe to chain a bear or a lion in the yard and then expect children to just stay away. It was a relief to hear that the dog owner called 911 and then shot the animal in the head, unlike other cases where pit bulls have been spirited away from the scene of the crime. In one case, the dog owners hid the offending animal and presented authorities with a similar-looking dog instead.
Pet owners have the responsibility to protect little neighbors from vicious dogs. Chains and ropes do not provide adequate protection, since a child may wander into the animal’s circle. A tall chain-link fence provides better protection. It’s all well and good to say “Children should stay on their own property,” but the reality is that children do not exercise adult judgment. This is why homeowners must put a fence around their swimming pool, rather than just saying “That kid that drowned shouldn’t have been on my property in the first place.”
Many people around the United States love dangerous breeds like pit bulls, and feel perfectly comfortable around them. Other people like to keep poisonous snakes for pets. Those of us who don’t share your affinity simply ask that you keep such pets to yourself. Do not bring them to the park where our little ones are playing. Do not parade them through the local street fair, forcing us to sweep our children away from a mouthful of fangs right at the level of their little faces. Do not leave a dangerous dog unattended on a rope in your yard, where an unsuspecting child may become their next chew toy. Do not assume that just because you consider Killer a loveable, harmless pup, he will ignore the instincts present in every cell of his body.
People and animals can live in harmony. All it takes is a bit of wisdom on the part of human beings.
#
Monday, June 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
Thanks for this post. Pit bulls seem to turn from "nice pet" into raging maniacs at the drop of a hat. I have heard many stories about these dogs having been perfect pets for many years, then they snap. Vicious dogs have no business being kept in neighborhoods, or anywhere else for that matter. No pet, cat or dog, can be totally trusted and should always be controlled.
Thanks Jeanie, As the Director of the Martin-Boyd Christian Home, even I had to be talked into pets at the facility. I have come to know the importance of pet therapy and thank the staff for pushing me.
Alice McDermott lectures 11 am CDT at Sewanee Monday July 20.
Pulitzer prize winner; you ought to consider.
Little off topic but thought you'd like to know
Great post!
I will point out though, that there is a LOT of misunderstanding about pool drownings (and a lot of other safety risks in childhood) prevalent in our culture, which I believe has resulted in what I call "protecting the fun out of childhood" http://knittedinthewomb.com/wp/?p=365
Approximately 1150 children (under the age of 19) die per year from drowning in the US. Not all of those drownings occur in swimming pools, but I have found it difficult to find statistics that break out swimming pool deaths from other drowning deaths--for example, this past Memorial Day weekend 3 drowning deaths were reported in my local newspaper--1 in a quarry, and two in natural bodies of water. In addition to quarries, rivers, streams, lakes, and the ocean; some children drown in bathtubs and other "small water sources." My best estimate, from piecing together different data sources (all linked to in my comment here) is that approximately 450 children die in swimming pools each year.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/pool.pdf) reports that when it comes to deaths of children under the age of 5 in residential swimming pools, only 2% are the result of children trespassing on a property. If we assume that statistic holds for children aged 5-19 and that all pool drownings are in residential pools, then that is less than 10 deaths per year that *might* be prevented by fences that include the perimeter of the house. Of course in older children, some of them may have scaled the fence to gain entry to the property, which would actually make the fence a barrier to rescue efforts.
Given that, a fence around a residential pool is virtually worthless unless it does not utilize the house as part of the enclosure (I really doubt that door alarms do much good, as I've been in homes where they get turned off because they are annoying when you've got kids going in and out of the house).
But even a complete fence has limited utility, since almost 1 in 3 (31%) children under age 5 who drown in residential pools were known to be swimming when the drowning occurred, and another 1 in 4 (23%) were known to be outside--some of them probably in an area that allowed free access to the pool--so that is between 31-54% of drowning victims. In fact, one study suggested that pool fencing would not prevent 80% of pool drownings in children under the age of 5.
Even those that do occur in swimming pools don't all occur in residential swimmings pools. According to a report for the National Institutes of Health (http://tinyurl.com/childhood-drowning), nearly half of all pool drownings in children aged 5-19 occurred in public pools--that is pools that not only have fences, but also lifeguards!
My bottom-line analysis (which is explained more on my blog) is that pool fencing is ineffective against preventing drowning, and costs tens of millions of dollars for each life that is saved. If we truly want to protect our children while allowing them to enjoy one of the joys of summer, we must come up with a less expensive and more effective method of protection.
Post a Comment